A Case study of Mitigating Risk of Invoice Payment Failure At Electricity Provider Company using the House of Risk Method
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52435/jaiit.v7i2.713Keywords:
House Of Risk, Mitigation Failure, Pareto Diagram, Payment Process, Risk ManagementAbstract
Considering that a complicated or delayed invoice payment process can disrupt business operations, the company must establish mitigation measures to prevent such occurrences and minimize potential failures that may hinder future business processes. This context specifically involves collaboration with business partners or vendors providing services and materials. This research aims to map out the activities within the invoice payment business process, identify risk events and related risk agents, and formulate mitigation strategies to reduce their negative impact. The House of Risk (HOR) method is utilized to prioritize risks according to Aggregate Risk Potential (ARP) scores then the scores will be classified with a Pareto diagram. This study aims to offer actionable recommendations for risk mitigation, mostly in digitalization and automation of systems that can help lower the rate of document rejections and accelerate the overall payment cycle. Ultimately, these improvements will contribute to increased operational efficiency and reinforce vendor confidence, ensuring that high-value invoices are processed more reliably and promptly.
References
Y. B. S. Nadaf, “The Effect of Financial Management Practices on the Financial Performance of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises in Belagavi, Karnataka,” no. 0975.
“ISO 37000:2018 - Risk management”.
M. Hassal and P. Lant, Fundamentals of Risk Management for Process Industry Engineers. Elsevier, 2023. doi: 10.1016/C2019-0-01193-4.
P. Hopkin, Fundamental of Risk Management, 5th ed. Kogan Page, 2018.
Z. Wang, J.-M. Gao, R.-X. Wang, K. Chen, Z.-Y. Gao, and W. Zheng, “Failure Mode and Effects Analysis by Using the House of Reliability-Based Rough VIKOR Approach,” IEEE Trans. Rel., vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 230–248, Mar. 2018, doi: 10.1109/TR.2017.2778316.
I. Nyoman Pujawan and L. H. Geraldin, “House of risk: a model for proactive supply chain risk management,” Business Process Management Journal, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 953–967, Nov. 2009, doi: 10.1108/14637150911003801.
C. W. Oktavia and I. N. Pujawan, “ANALISIS DAN MITIGASI RISIKO PADA PROSES PENGADAAN BARANG DAN JASA DENGAN PENDEKATAN METODE INTERPRETIVE STRUCTURAL MODELLING (ISM), ANALYTIC NETWORK PROCESS (ANP), DAN HOUSE OF RISK (HOR),” 2013.
M. Alrifaey, T. Sai Hong, E. E. Supeni, A. As’arry, and C. K. Ang, “Identification and Prioritization of Risk Factors in an Electrical Generator Based on the Hybrid FMEA Framework,” Energies, vol. 12, no. 4, p. 649, Feb. 2019, doi: 10.3390/en12040649.
W. Boonyanusith and P. Jittamai, “Blood Supply Chain Risk Management using House of Risk Model,” Walailak J Sci & Tech, vol. 16, no. 8, pp. 573–591, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.48048/wjst.2019.3472.
L. P. Handoko and Mokh. Suef, “Evaluation and Mitigation of Android Application in PT. Aku Pintar Indonesia,” IJPS, vol. 0, no. 5, p. 487, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.12962/j23546026.y2019i5.6409.
S. G. Partiwi, V. Nur Islami, and H. Firmanto, “House of Risk (HOR) Approach to Manage Risk involving Multi-stakeholders: The Case of Automotive Industry Cluster of Multifunctional Rural Mechanized Tool (MRMT),” OSCM: An Int. Journal, pp. 133–139, May 2023, doi: 10.31387/oscm0520378.
A. S. Dewanti and P. D. Karningsih, “Risk Analysis and Mitigation in the Procurement Process of Overhaul Services,” IJPS, vol. 0, no. 3, p. 98, Oct. 2021, doi: 10.12962/j23546026.y2020i3.11131.
P. Kardos, P. Lahuta, and M. Hudakova, “Risk Assessment Using the FMEA method in the Organization of Running Events,” Transportation Research Procedia, vol. 55, pp. 1538–1546, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.trpro.2021.07.143.
M. Rozudin and N. A. Mahbubah, “IMPLEMENTASI METODE HOUSE OF RISK PADA PENGELOLAAN RISIKO RANTAI PASOKAN HIJAU PRODUK BOGIE S2HD9C (Studi Kasus: PT Barata Indonesia),” JISI, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–11, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.24853/jisi.8.1.1-11.
M. Khatun, F. Wagner, R. Jung, and M. Glaß, “An application of DEMATEL and fuzzy DEMATEL to evaluate the interaction of safety management system and cybersecurity management system in automated vehicles,” Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, vol. 124, p. 106566, Sept. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.engappai.2023.106566.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Widyasari Retnaningtyas, Niniet Indah Arvitrida
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
All our articles are published under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) license.
